Scenario: It’s a typical freight broker Tuesday, and you’re juggling a dozen tasks before noon. You’re monitoring lanes to ensure carriers are staying efficient, fielding calls from customers asking about rates and transit times, and trying to make sure your margins stay solid. You know that to really thrive in this freight market, you need clear insights for better, on-the-fly decision making — something that can take the guesswork out of things like lane optimization, carrier selection, and margin enhancement.
But which analytics tool is right for the job?
Most 3PLs and freight brokers are stuck somewhere between doing manual analysis in spreadsheets and adopting powerful – but generic – business intelligence like Power BI or Tableau. What they’re not evaluating as deeply are transportation-specific solutions like Third Axiom.
In this post, we’ll break down both the strengths and trade-offs of each tool type, compare their costs, and explain why industry-specific intelligence could be the game-changer you’re looking for.
1. Pros & Cons of Manual Analysis
Examples: Excel, Google Sheets
Pros:
Affordable & Accessible: Excel and Google Sheets are often readily available, and most people have at least basic spreadsheet skills.
Flexible for Simple Data Tasks: For quick number-crunching, spreadsheets are very flexible. You can create custom tables, formulas, and even basic charts.
Good for Small-Scale Analysis: If you’re working with limited data (e.g. just a handful of customers or carriers), spreadsheets are often enough.
Cons:
Very Manual: Entering data, maintaining spreadsheets, and creating reports can be time-consuming. Plus, it’s easy to make mistakes with manual data entry.
Doesn’t Scale Well: Excel can handle basic data analysis, but if you’re dealing with complex, large-scale freight data, it starts to slow down and may even crash.
Limited Analytics Capabilities: Excel doesn’t offer advanced analytics or automated insights. It’s great for simple math but lacks tools for things like predictive analysis or change monitoring.
Total Cost of Ownership:
Excel or Google Sheets are affordable upfront, but as you grow, the time investment required to maintain data manually really add up. When your workload expands, so does the risk of errors—and that’s something you can’t afford in this industry. Over time, the limitations of manual tools can create “hidden” costs in the form of inefficiencies and missed opportunities.
2. Pros & Cons of Generic Business Intelligence
Examples: Power BI, Tableau
Pros:
Great for Data Visualization: Power BI and Tableau are known for turning raw data into eye-catching dashboards and reports that make data easy to understand.
Data Connectivity: These tools can pull data from a wide variety of sources, so if you’re working with multiple systems, they can connect it all in one place.
Scales Beyond Spreadsheets: Power BI and Tableau can handle large data sets, making them more suitable for bigger operations than spreadsheets.
Cons:
Not Tailored for Freight: These platforms are generic, which means they don’t come with freight-specific metrics, reports, or dashboards.
Difficult Implementation: Transportation data is messy and often takes expertise to translate, so customizing a generic BI solution for freight can be problematic.
Ongoing Maintenance Costs: Many brokers end up hiring pricey consultants to set up and maintain business intelligence tools because they require advanced skills.
Total Cost of Ownership:
Power BI offers an affordable entry-level option, while Tableau is typically more expensive. Beyond subscription costs, there’s also the cost of customization and maintenance, which often require a full-time employee. If you don’t have in-house expertise, you may need to hire someone to adapt these tools to your specific freight needs, which dramatically increases the total cost over time.
3. Pros & Cons of Freight-Specific Analytics
Examples: Third Axiom
Transportation-specific analytics are designed exclusively for freight and logistics providers. They come with pre-built modules and dashboards focused on what matters most to freight brokers. To be clear, there are many companies out there that specialize in various segments of the freight journey – FourKites, for instance, is excellent for shipment visibility; and Greenscreens is great for rate-specific intelligence. However, for the purposes of this comparison, we’re going to focus on Third Axiom, which provides a holistic analysis of your very own freight data.
Pros:
Freight-Focused Insights: Third Axiom’s solutions already understand the nuances and complexities of shipment data and come with prebuilt modules tailored for freight brokers.
Right Out-of-the-Box: Unlike generic BI tools, which need extensive customization to adapt to broker needs, there’s no integration or customization needed with Axiom-Apps.
Comprehensive Freight Intelligence: Axiom-Apps studies your freight data to provide a holistic analysis of what is going on with your shipments, not just one leg of the journey.
Cons:
Learning Curve for New Users: If you’re used to generic BI or spreadsheets, you’ll need to learn a few new data mining tricks that are specific to the tool.
Manual Data Formatting: For Axiom-Apps, all you need is a spreadsheet to get started. The downside to this is that you’ll need to make sure your file is formatted correctly.
Upload Upon Login: When you use Axiom-Apps, you need to upload your data file every time you log in. That said, you’re able to save your mapping, so it’s quick and easy.
Total Cost of Ownership:
Axiom-Apps pays for itself quickly by drastically cutting down the time spent on setup, maintenance and reporting. It also provides faster insights and requires less customization. And as your business scales, you won’t need to look for a new solution — you’ll be able to move to the enterprise version when you’re ready for it and still use the same Axiom-Apps interface you already know.
Why Industry-Specific Tools Make Sense for Freight Brokers
Freight data is complex—messy, even. Every day, you’re dealing with a tangled web of details: freight classes, modes, volumes, lanes, equipment types, rates, transit times, and more. Managing all these variables isn’t easy, and the data complexity means that the risk of mistakes is high if you’re trying to force-fit a generic analytics tool into the freight environment.
Transportation-specific analytics tools are built with this complexity in mind. They’re designed to handle the nuances of freight data without requiring heavy customization. The software already “speaks” the language of freight: it understands the difference between TL and LTL, how volumes and lane types impact pricing, and which equipment types are suitable for specific shipments. This deep understanding of freight logistics means you’re getting cleaner data and more accurate insights right from the start—without wrestling with workarounds to make a generic tool fit your needs.
With industry-specific analytics, you can skip the time-consuming setup of freight-specific metrics and go straight to the insights that matter. These tools allow you to accurately track shipment performance, analyze lane efficiency, and optimize carrier choices without the risk of data misinterpretation. In an industry where margins and timing are critical, having a tool that “gets” freight data isn’t just convenient—it’s essential for reducing errors, making informed decisions, and staying competitive.
Comments